Compassionate Release Denied for Defendant with Neurological Deficits from Brain Tumor

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan (https://www.mied.uscourts.gov/)

On March 5, 2021, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan denied Scott David McQuarrie’s motion for compassionate release. McQuarrie had argued that his brain tumor caused serious functional and cognitive impairments that diminished his ability to care for himself while in custody.

In 2018, McQuarrie was convicted of twelve counts related to false statements and conversion of collateral pledged for a loan from the Farm Service Agency and sentenced to serve concurrent terms of 70 months, 60 months, and 15 months. His sentence was enhanced because of an obstruction of justice charge he received for repeatedly interrupting jury selection proceedings before his trial.

After experiencing memory and ambulatory difficulties in federal custody, McQuarrie petitioned for compassionate release, arguing that his “ongoing neurological deficits including ‘speech, memory, and motor skills issues,’ constitute[d] ‘serious functional or cognitive impairments that substantially diminish his ability to care for himself.’” He also notified the court of his intent to introduce evidence that his tumor may have affected his conduct before and during his trial.

During a resentencing hearing in February, 2021, the defendant’s neurosurgeon, Dr. Brian Dalton, testified that he had performed a craniotomy and removed a grapefruit sized intracranial tumor from the defendant’s brain in June 2020. He stated that the tumor may have “caused some neurological symptoms like changes in personality and behavior,” for as long as a decade before McQuarrie’s surgery. He explained that the “defendant may achieve a full cognitive recovery but that some residual symptoms may persist,” recommending that he see a neuropsychologist for rehabilitation.

Following Dr. Dalton’s testimony, the court reduced McQuarrie’s sentence to concurrent terms of 60 months. However, the court concluded that his ongoing neurological deficits were not sufficiently “extraordinary and compelling” to justify an immediate compassionate release, asserting that the only reason the defendant had not received neuropsychological treatment was “because Dr. Dalton and prison officials [had] not yet successfully communicated regarding his treatment.”

The court noted that prison representatives in the courtroom had expressed willingness to accommodate McQuarrie’s future neurological treatment as directed by Dr. Dalton. Consequently, the court denied the defendant’s motion for compassionate release with prejudice.

Citation: United States v. McQuarrie, 2021 WL 843177

Keywords: brain tumor, compassionate release, craniotomy, compelling reason, neurological

This post is the 93rd post as part of an ongoing Center for Law, Brain & Behavior (CLBB) series tracking the latest developments in law and neuroscience cases. To see previous posts about recent cases, see the full case archive on the CLBB website. To see updates on legal scholarship, see the Neurolaw News, hosted by the MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Law and Neuroscience. This project is made possible through support of the Dana Foundation.

--

--

--

at Mass General Hospital, Harvard Medical School

Love podcasts or audiobooks? Learn on the go with our new app.

Recommended from Medium

Forensic Accounting.

Nature or Nurture? The Identical Twins Who Turned Out Murderers

How One Man’s Testimony Solved Rayna Rison’s Cold Case Murder

The Justice System Isn’t Broken. It Is Working As Intended.

Ashworth — Unfair Risk-Based Possession Offenses

“Arrest Disparities of African Americans and its Effects”

North Carolina Supreme Court Remands Case for a New Trial to Determine Whether Defendant Killed His…

I Saw Freedom…But It Was Only a Reflection

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Center for Law, Brain & Behavior

Center for Law, Brain & Behavior

at Mass General Hospital, Harvard Medical School

More from Medium

BreederDAO

What is BscScan and how to use it?

On the web Gaming — US Again Intends Withdrawal from the WTO in Challenge with Antigua & Barbuda

Safety Speakers: Brine Hamilton, CHPA